This to me seems like a pressing problem to solve. It follows the theme that it's not necessarily true that robots will "take our jobs". Three arguments are:

• Economics: that teaches us that blending technology with labour increases the productivity of labour and therefore the value of that labour
• Human + Robot will always win over robot alone or human alone
• Pre general-AI phase: during this phase at least a robot will only be able to do part of each job - causing job redesign more than job removal
• Theory of the leisure class and other forces that drive ever increasing activity and or customer expectations

The journal is a way of exploring this and other themes:

Journal of Social-Cyber Organisation

Other notes

https://twitter.com/matthewdegeorge/status/1184588927090483200?s=20